- Wall-e - As a mom, I am occasionally forced to watch kid movies that are worse then torture. Usually, we Netflix 'em or get them from the library and let the kids watch these when we're, um, doing something else. Luckily, they've started putting the good stuff on DVD, such as the original Scooby Doos, Thundercats, and all the other cheesy but much better cartoons that we used to watch back in the day. WALL-E, though, does not fall into the torturous kid movie category. It's fantastic. It's got that post-apocolyptic flavor from Idiocracy, but mixes it with hope for humanity and a sweet little love story. Love it.
- Meet the Robinsons - more cheesy Disney, but I really liked this one. A cute tale about an inventor who loses hope, mixed with some time travel fun and a sweet-but-not-sickening theme about the importance of family.
- Death at a Funeral - Featuring, among others, Alan Tudyk from Firefly fame, this is a hilarious movie about a family's shenanigans during a proper British funeral. Up there with Keeping Mum for dark humor.
- Laura - fantastic film noir classic. Gene Tierney and her male counterparts play it well.
- Dexter: The Series - the writers of this series (or, well, the writer of the book it's based on;I'm not sure where the brilliance originates....) take the tired old serial killer theme and turn it in on its head. Michael C. Hall creates a completely sympathetic sociopath whose life unravels but improves as he learns how to feel for the first time since the age of three. Anyone who has felt betrayal or a detachment from normal life will find much to appreciate in the fantastically complex, well-developed performances. See it. I am impatiently awaiting season 3 on DVD.
- Terminator: the Sarah Connor Chronicles - Summer Glau, another Firefly alum, plays a kick-arse Terminator back to save good 'ole John Connor yet again. Action-packed fun.
- War, Inc - I was initially disappointed with this one, as huge fan of Grosse Pointe Blank, but after a second viewing this one started to grow on me. Satirical performances from John Cusack, Marisa Tomei, Ben Kingsley, Joh's sister Joan, and Hilary Duff make for a crazy yet somewhat accurate trip through the life of a government contractor. Many cringe-worthy scenes pointing out how ridiculous it is to rebuild a country you've destroyed.
- Casino Royale - Daniel Craig rocks as the newest Bond. Enough said here.
- The Dark Knight - even darker than the first Christopher Nolan iteration of Batman, Heath Ledger does bring this one to greatness with his portayal of the twisted, tortured Joker.
- Driving Lessons - A cute British coming of age story, starring the kid who played Ron Beasley in the Harry Potter series as a sheltered child who learns to live when he becomes the companion of an elderly actress.
- The Ghost and Mrs. Muir - Apparently, I was a Gene Tierney fan this year, since this is the second of three very different movies featuring her talents. In this slow, quiet little tale, a woman meets and falls for the ghost of a ship captain who haunts the large house she and daughter visit, then move to after her husband dies.
- The Shop Around the Corner - Gene Tierney again, in the movie that apparently launched the idea for the cute if annoying You've Got Mail. James Stewart plays a clerk at a store who can't stand the new employee, a smart and opinionated woman who argues with him at every turn. Meanwhile, he carries on an escalating love-letter relationship with a woman who, as you can guess, is a little closer than he thinks. Viewers will find much satisfaction in the way Stewart's character accepts his love and slowly works to win over the woman who thinks he is the enemy.
- Bell, Book, and Candle - Kim Novak and Jimmy Stewart (again) in another classic love story between a witch who hides her charms and an everyday guy. Jack Lemmon provides much comic relief as Novak's brother.
- Father Goose - Good 'ole Cary Grant deftly plays a lazy drunk in this comedy. After a colleague tricks him into becoming a spotter on an uninhabited island during the war, a French teacher and her young charges crash land and turn his world upside down.
- The Secret Garden - this film adaptation of the family classic held my kids rapt. Talented performances from the young cast and Dame Maggie Smith.
- Mood:
chipper
I have a lot more to say in this vein, though; I just feel that I should bite my tongue in certain settings. :)
We had health insurance a few years back; I worked for a lovely firm that provided very good benefits and a nice salary. Under my old health plan, the firm deducted just under $200 per month for health benefits that covered my whole family. Of course, coverage never covers everything; we had to pay a co-pay each visit of $10 to $25, plus a co-pay for every prescription medication, which ranged from $5 for a generic to $25 for a non-preferred, name-brand medication. This is, in fact, a lot of money, but at the time, this was not a concern. The salary was a good one, which made up for this monthly deduction. Besides, we felt that having coverage just in case was essential. We lived in an area where traffic was atrocious; I'd been rear-ended three times in one year. What if any of those had been more serious? The DC sniper shot a kid a block from our old house. What if that had been our child? Most importantly, we were having a second child (my daughter is now two years old). Without insurance coverage, we would've had to pay out of the teeth to deliver her, keep her immunized, and bring her in for well-baby visits. Itemized, these expenses would have run us about $8000 total for the first year, and she was healthy and happy baby with no complications. Even before delivery, she would've cost us a pretty penny; prenatal care visits are monthly, with plenty of labs and imaging costs included in plan coverage. Obviously, having health insurance coverage in this case is a no-brainer. You don't have to be Danica McKellar to figure out that paying $2500 total for a year's coverage is much less than $8000.
Now, that's not the case. The math is very simple for us right now: insurance costs way too much compared to the real costs of health care. I'll be starting the Ph.D. program this fall. Tuition is covered and a stipend is included, but health benefits are not. We can choose to purchase a health plan, but the costs are substantial -- $7000 for the family! That's over $580 per month. You can be sure that I would never let an employer scrape that much off of my paycheck every month. For this bargain price, the plan covers just 80% of the costs for normal visits. This is outrageous. Are we really going to spend over $7000 per year on health expenses, making this plan worth the investment? My daughter is not a baby anymore. Each of us, including the two kids, needs a yearly checkup and occasional shots. My current doctor gives you a discount when you pay cash, as his staff needs to do no paperwork to gain payment. So, well child and acute care visits cost about $75 each. Immunizations are about $15-$30 a shot. That works out to be less than $600 per year for preventive care. Throw in 4 acute care visits and prescriptions, and that still keeps expenses under what I used to pay just for coverage alone. Even adding in the $50 for a pack of birth control pills every 28 days (that's about $660 per year) keeps costs comparable to what we were spending as insured people in the DC area. It seems stupid to put so much of our money into a plan like this. We're better off putting that cash into savings and making interest income from it. Buying this kind of insurance DOES NOT MAKE RATIONAL SENSE.
Or does it? On the other hand, there are the what-ifs. What if we get into a car accident, and require surgeries to re-attach limbs? What if I get cancer? What if my husband collapses on the farm, and has to be rushed to a hospital, incurring ambulance fees on top of his treatment expenses? What if my son breaks an arm on the playground? What if I miss a pill, we end up expecting another child, and this pregnancy is more complicated? This decision is a horribly risky one to make. I don't know what to do.
*grin*
- Mood:
accomplished
- Mood:
apathetic
This time, it was an NIH laptop. Hmmm. Perhaps the feds should stop using laptops for all of that sensitive info?
A European company found that 70% of people will give away their login and password info for... dum de de dum.... candy! Identity thieves, take heed!
Apparently UT-San Antonio students had a little problem drafting an honor code for their institution -- good thing they were able to copy from Brigham Young! This kind of story just makes me chuckle.
In other news, scientists have discovered that dyslexia is indicated by different portions of the brain, depending on whether the language is alphabetic (English, for instance) or pictorial (Chinese, for instance). Researchers had children with and without dyslexia perform reading tasks under an MRI, and conducted this experiment with both English and Chinese speakers. English learners with dyslexia had significantly different brain activity in two sections near the back of the brain, while Chinese learners exhibited problems with activity in a frontal portion usually linked to "working memory." This is some fascinating stuff -- if I'm with a child with dyslexia in English, does this mean that I could teach him to read Chinese with no problem?
AccessIT Knowledge Base: Are electronic whiteboards accessible to people with disabilities? Electronic whiteboards do bring up an access issue. That is, there are some people that cannot use a mouse or stylus -- how can we deal with this fact in the classroom?
In 2003, the Washington Post broke a story about National Security Letters, Dept of Justice documents that requested specific information on a patron or customer while placing a gag order on the recipient. In 2003 after the news leak, then-Attorney General Ashcroft stated that no libraries had been tapped for Patriot info. However, according to this article, as of mid-2003, 444 out of 1500 libraries surveyed had been approached for patron information by a government agency (225 of them refused to provide info). I'm not sure what the survey methods were, so those numbers may or may not be accurate. The only publicized case thus far involves a librarian at a non-profit that handles records for 20+
The ACLU has documented case progress here, even providing a pdf of the actual national security letter. PBS show NOW also featured an interview with the librarians involved with the suit.
A link on the Post article noted that the FBI issues tens of thousands of these letters per year, but the source does not categorize by recipient type (phone companies and ISPs, booksellers and libraries, banks, etc). The ALA has posted extensively on this topic in its intellectual freedom section, and provides guidance for librarians dealing with this contentious issue. Most state library associations have also adopted policies (NYLA's is here).
Some library systems (Seattle provides a good example) have developed internal policies. I know that my library does not have a huge policy, but we follow the
If you're very interested in the issue, I recommend looking at the work of Mary Minnow, a librarian-turned-lawyer who consults for the
"It’s one thing to value the MLS. It’s another thing entirely to condescend to non-MLS librarians (yes, I said librarians), paraprofessionals, and other non-degreed library workers, to discount their opinions, and to ignore their contributions to their libraries and to librarianship as a whole. We don’t need to be infighting; we have better things to do."I straddle this topic as a library student working under the librarian title at my small, rural library. My boss does not have an MLS, but she is a worthy and dedicated director. After a I graduate, I by no means expect to suddenly feel like I know more than she does just because I've got a new certificate for my wall. However, I do value the ideals behind an MLS degree. Otherwise, I wouldn't be in the program. I think the MLS offers the hows and whys behind the everyday actions undertaken in a library. Great, non-degreed librarians may do the right thing, but may be at a loss when trying to connect their actions to the big picture.
I was astounded when, a few months back, I discovered that I couldn't get class credit for completing a real-life project at my own library because.... dum-de-DUM... my professor did not consider my director a real librarian. This instructor required all projects to be conducted with the partnership of an MLS-degreed librarian. This sparks some very mixed feelings for me. My director is a much better library professional than many of the MLS holders I have dealt with. Yet, at the same time, I can understand my professor's dilemma here. A non-MLS librarian may seem like an unknown quantity to a stranger. An MLS holder, in theory, at least knows about all of the material they should be applying to the profession, even if they're not, in practice, doing so. Non-MLS holders are self-made; if they're good it's because they have reached beyond their potential. They just haven't forked out that cash and jumped through that hoop.
I'm glad that Rachel stirred up so much thinking about this issue. I encourage you to read her blog entry and the active discussion following it.
- Mood:
contemplative
